Of traitors, sides, and evil

I mentioned briefly a few posts ago that I created a new toon. Those in the know will recognize immediately that this blue-tailed lovely is an Alliance character, which means I went other to The Other Side with this alt. I have finally spent some real time as an alliance player (she’s currently lvl 22, my new Lantanna), and have gotten a bit more exposure to that side of the quests, stories, toons, and the all-important Trade Chat.

Alliance vs. Horde - not a fair fight in this case.

Alliance vs. Horde - not a fair fight in this case.

I had only really ever played Horde. Brought to WoW by a friend as I was, I had no choice if I wanted to play with her (J. – see my early posts). This Alliance thing was actually a bit more novel and new than I had realized. Not only are there whole new sets of low level quests (yeay! new content for me!), the narrative seems rather different. My new Lantanna is now on the “good guys” side.

I never really bought the whole “Horde is evil” thing. But there is a morality story, here (which Elnia of Pink Pigtail Inn discussed recently). When we’re avidly on our killing sprees for gold, reputation, and XP, does it matter who we are, what the story is?

The Alliance races (esp. human, dwarf, gnome) are those that mythology generally identifies as the “good guys”, while Horde are the baddies, orcs, trolls, zombies (undead). I loved the idea of playing a baddie when I first started, but I do see, now, the slightly different narrative and atmosphere around WoW’s Alliance – the “good”** side. Even the names have this valence: “horde” is usually used to describe groups of threatening beings, a la “horde of invaders.”

How much do these narratives matter? How much do we really even pay attention to the stories of the game? (those not on Role Playing servers, anyway) Does it change how we play, approach our characters, interact with other people when we select the “ugly” side?

Some folks who study video games talk about the importance of the story – that the representations of “evil” or power, and the way that you move through ideas are part of what makes the games appealing and engaging. Many who study those stories do so as literary scholars, examining symbols and themes and characters just as they would in Shakespeare or Tony Morrison.

Popular culture agrees: the objections to Grand Theft Auto center around the stories and situations the game presents because of their violence, racial overtones, sexist scenarios, etc.

Other scholars such as Squire (2002) and Dickey (2006) point to the narratives of games like SimCity as providing educational potential (few such concerns over WoW, my friends –  although some people like IBM say you learn leadership skills…). Others such as Turkle explain that one of the reasons fewer girls get into video games is because the stories are very male-centered. Some even claim that breaking the narrative, working outside the story, hinders learning and reduces motivation to play. Of course, a big part of this is that in video games, we’re not just reading the story, we’re part of the story. From Nelson to Lanham to Murray to Steinkuehler, scholars have long hailed online participatory narratives as offering rich, flexible, and engaging stories that can be far more appealing than the linear stories of paper. We learn to read, write, and analyze with them. In fact, Steinkuehler (2007) claims, “MMOGs are not replacing literacy activities but rather are literacy activities.” We learn about and express who we are with them, in them, and through them, as Crawford & Gosling (2009) argue. In some cases, those narratives are part of a game’s purpose: games used by the US Army to train soldiers; a game about Darfur designed to teach people about the atrocities there; games for kids to teach problem-solving, etc.

So by joining and investing in the Alliance side, I’ve shifted into a different narrative within WoW. Part of me feels an allegiance, socially, to “my” side – am I a traitor to my Hordies for leveling an Alliance alt? Do we develop a loyalty for our side in a general sense? (I confess that I do have twinges of silly guilt over it…)

In some ways, I think we do. For sure, those pesky Alliance folks are always killing me, so yeah, I see them all as enemies on my server because the game makes them so. The obvious visible cues of our “differences” designed by the game including the way characters are drawn, the boundaries of “enemy territory” where every NPC will attack me without mercy, and the different leveling experiences, reinforce these loyalties.

I also kind of feel as though I’m spying. “Ooooh! Look! I can see Exodar without getting killed! I can talk to Night Elves! What are these folks saying in Trade Chat? Hm. They seem kind of nicer in Trade Chat over here…” In fact, I could be spying. On Destro we once made friends with someone who had a 70 Alliance toon, and he would periodically hop on Vent to let us know a raid was happening, or to coordinate a you-kill-me, then I’ll-kill-you arrangement for farming honor (in Nagrand, of course). It felt deliciously naughty.

So how much do the stories matter? Is the folk wisdom true that Horde tends to attract more of the 14 year old boys who want to vent their anger on the world? Do we gravitate towards – or get pulled in by – certain sides or races in WoW because of their stories? Is there really a moral difference?

**Note, though, that especially in the most recent expansion, the Horde aren’t entirely dsecribed as the bad guys, and that they actually join up with the Alliance to fight the “real” bad guy, the Lich King.


6 responses to “Of traitors, sides, and evil

  1. Well, depending on what point of view you subscribe to, you very well could be a spy.

    If you follow lore on both sides, who did what and why, most people will side with the Alliance as being the “good guys”- when in reality both sides have done horrible things. The symbols used by either side (and sub-symbols of each race) denote vast cultural influences- the alliance being more “civilized” and using more visually similar artwork to the medival period would make most assume they are “good”, wheras most horde symbols seem more tribal and chaotic “uncivilized” barbarians (like the huns, native americans, shit like that).

    Pre-BC Horde warriors were the one of two viable tanking classes (druid tanks weren’t THAT great), whereas Alliance could have paladins and warriors. This “imbalance” in terms of high-end raiding would force more horde players to finely tune their craft (shaman were occationally off-tanks in some fights, since they had shields)- forcing a higher performance and a more close-nit community.

    Combine this with the fact that averaged across all servers, Alliance outnumber Horde (and always has), i think it has more to do with a fondness of playing with (and rooting for) the underdog.

  2. I mostly play horde, but I do have an alliance alt – a level 80 draenei hunter.

    what I’ve discovered is that in general, its all the same. the trade chat is practically identical (Chuck Norris jokes, murloc movie titles, occasional anal links, arguments cases of homophobia and racism, once in a blue moon theorycrafting conversation, and here and there people actually use trade…for trade), there are nice people and jerks, angry 14 year olds and people with children of their own – on both sides.

    I think B has agood point about wishing to play an underdog, a misunderstood and often unfairly maligned group of people. A lot of times it also comes down to the visual preference. lets face it – when it comes to looks, alliance is pretty boring. you have your humans, your short stocky humans, you’re miniature humans and tall blue long eared humans.

    to be honest – I’ve never been able to level up any alliance race past lvl 8, besides draenei – at least they look interesting :P Add to that the people who make their choice of a faction based on what their friends are playing (like you did)?

    I do admit that its fun seeing the other side of the picture when it comes to quests :) And on both sides you have your honorable npcs and your “I hate them, bring me their ears/insignias/etc” npcs :) I really think that this is the true genous of World of warcraft story lines. neither side is perfect, neither side is all good or all bad. they are all fallible and therefore more interesting, more relatable for it.

  3. @ B. I think that I was thrilled to be playing Horde for exactly what you point out, B.: I like the idea of playing the underdog. I didn’t really want to be one of the “beautiful people” of Allaince. Maybe they were a bit boring to me, as Leah said.

    All those cultural symbols of bad, barbarian, etc. made playing that side are appealing to me. (on a side note, I was classified in a ridiculous Facebook quiz as being “chaotic good” recently, apparently akin to V. from V for Vendetta, so I guess it all fits).

    The unbalance in the sides’ population – which I didn’t realise – is really interesting to me. As well as the idea that Horde are more close-knit. I wonder if that’s still true at all? Now I want to go survey each side and see if certian kinds of people tend to pick one side over the other….

    and @Leah: I do like the Draenei – gotta love those tails – and I’m with you that human is *yawn*. Maybe that’s one of the things that is different – we Hordies like the weirder things in life…?

    It *is* reassuring to hear that Trade Chat is acutally the same. Thank goodness for the Chuck Norris jokes.

  4. oh! oh! oh! this is AWSOME!!! you are my personal hero even more than you were before.

  5. I chose Alliance because I prefer being the “good guy”. However, I do like fighting for the underdog; the misunderstood, the oppressed.

    I worked with a guy that played an undead rogue because “Who wants to be the good guy? This is my chance to be heartless and cruel with no social backlash.” I thought he was an asshole in real life too, so it didn’t really surprise me.

    As far as story goes, I let it flow over me without really leaving an impression. It may be the several programming classes I’ve taken, but I don’t see the story and quests as anything more than a vehicle for getting characters to a higher level without becoming bored in the process. I don’t even read the quests anymore, other than to mark the location, goal and return point.

    When I rolled my tauren shaman on Lothen, part of my reasoning was so that I could see the horde side of the story, yet I still just skim the quest and head off looking for the next widget I need to collect.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s