Value and the self

One of the things about musing on the different spheres of value, shortcomings, definitions, is that the selves we develop in each of these spheres are related to the self we identify internally.

A lot of people believe in a “core self” that runs through all contexts, all roles, all spheres. This “core” self  is thought to be Truth, the “real me” that I choose to show or hide depending on the situation. That somehow the self we show when we’re nervous, or unsure, or cranky, or professional, or partying is not completely “real” – that those are fake parts of ourselves overlaid on top of truth likes masks. Not really “me.”

I see this a different way. To me, these are all parts of us, and should be embraced as real aspects of the self,  just as “true” as the self of the intense 4 a.m. conversations in which we confess hidden feelings or fears. I don’t see those other roles we adopt as masks, but rather different manifestations of who we are. In that sense, then, I don’t belive in a “true” self, although I do believe we bring out and push away different things at different times.

Chodrow (1981) claims that the self is fundamentally relational, and so is linked to norms of interpersonal roles that are necessarily linked to social contexts.  We gain a sense of self through interaction with those in the society around us and thus the self is intertwined with the other. 

This, to me, is fundamentally about being fluid, able to shift our language, perspective, approach to fit different contexts. I call it flexibility, along with cognitive scientists (cognitive flexibility), but I take it beyond their focus on learning and suggest that this is a more general social mechanism.

Some people are more flexible, meaning that some people adapt more easily to different contexts, speak the “languages” of different spheres more readily. They manifest the sides of themselves that suit their needs at that moment – not in a false or strategic way, but as part of seeking mutual understanding.

Thinking about who we are in WoW, then, is for me thinking about how we respond to and adapt to the specific contexts of that space. In a highly social context – in between battles, cooling down after a raid – we manifest that self that is more social, seeking out others, building bonds. In a demanding technical challenge, we shift to a more pragmatic, rational approach, perhaps.

I think this is particularly clear in gender roles (and I even have a name for it: Gender Role Flexibility). Along with Bem (1972) I don’t believe we are always “all masculine” or “all feminine”, nor (departing from Bem) do I believe that the balance between our feminine and masculine sides is always the same. I believe we change our gender-related behaviour according to the demands of the context, as well.

So when hanging with the boys in WoW, I tend to be a bit more “boy-like” – I call upon the parts of me that are more in-line with their prevailing styles of communication, values, and perspectives. Obviously this is different depending on the specific group, but the idea is the same. With an all woman group I might show more of my stereotypical feminine qualities, but again, depends on the specific women.

This is, in part, one of the reasons that feeling oddly ungendered in some situations in WoW (where everyone first assumes I’m a guy) is disconcerting for me. I think that flexibility, that shifting of what I bring to the conversation/situation is highly dependent on a two-way interaction. I identify the context of my interaction with the other person under certain assumptions – among them, that I am seen as “female.” Break that, and it turns out I’m not so sure how to act. Well, I can pretend to actually be a guy (physically), but that gets old. It’s too much work.

I just can't hit the button.

I just can't hit the button.

On the other hand, “passing” like that is interesting. It’s not hard for me, especially if people assume I’m male first (they’re not looking for signs I’m not male, I assume). I don’t get the sense that many of the guys I meet who play female toons are trying to “pass” as female – or that they even think others will wonder. For me, though, even playing a male toon is weirdly difficult. I’ve tried, but I just can’t hit that Accept button to create one.

I’m not on a role play server, and for some reason I have a really difficult time pretending to be things I’m not when interacting in WoW. I have a rough time “passing” in gender, age, occupation, you name it.

But I wonder sometimes why this is. Am I just impulsively trying to express myself as much as possible in this limited space with no body to help me out? Do I feel as though I’m lying? Neither of those quite rings true for me.

How much do we really tell our WoW buddies about ourselves? How much do we craft that more idealized self when we chat online? Leave out the pesky weaknesses and paint ourselves as we would like to be…


4 responses to “Value and the self

  1. Well, I can certainly see why don’t want to be *him* in particular. He has simply dreadful hair.

    To be honest, I think the extent to which we craft idealised selves is not necessarily greater in virtual spaces than real ones – I think the difference lies in the freedom to expand that into pure fantasy. So perhaps it’s easier / more appealing for being a nicer, a little wittier, a little more daring, a little more outgoing – exactly as you might be when introduced to a new group for the first time – to bleed into being someone else entirely. This is random musing. I’m not sure I even believe myself :)

  2. I love this insight – it *is* very much like when you meet someone for the first time offline. I wonder, though, does it last longer on WoW?

    Maybe it only does when what you’re trying to hide is somehow tied to the physical. I don’t ever have to admit I have that enormous pimple on my nose, or that my teeth are raggedy in WoW.

    Maybe letting us hide from the myriad phsical flaws we are insecure about helps us feel more daring, wittier, outgoing, etc. in general. Helps us bring out the badass and leave the doubting behind.

    But I suppose you can’t entirely hide from being a jerk, more’s the pity. And I wonder if maybe there’s something about WoW that also encourages people to bring out the jerk? I would like to hope so, given how often people behave like idiots. Not that you heard it from me.

  3. People bring out the “jerk” in WoW primarily because of a feeling of entitlement. “I have the best gear, these people are worse players than myself”. PVP/Arena junkies are usually guilty of being a jerk the most, demanding nothing less than perfection in any encounter (but, simultaneously, always attempting to be “the best” that their class can be). That, combined with the fact that WoW has always been about primarily selfish interactions (i NEED that, he NINJA’d it), being a jerk gets to everyone at one level or another.

    Thats why you don’t see 80’s voluntarily hanging out with 30’s for the sake of social interaction.

  4. Although, back in the day a bunch of kind 70’s frequently hung out with me (and my pal J., who I talk about in the early posts of this blog) a whole lot for the sake of social interaction.

    But then, I guess we weren’t jerks : )

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s